Commit Latency vs Throughput
Commit Latency vs Throughput
Analysis of how commit latency scales with achieved throughput.
Values shown as mean ± standard deviation across seeds.
num_tables = 1
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.04 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 0.86 ± 0.04 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.80 ± 0.01 | 1.06 ± 0.04 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.06 | 1.59 ± 0.08 | 1.6 |
| 2.1 ± 0.0 | 99.8 ± 0.1 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 1.38 ± 0.03 | 2.05 ± 0.09 | 1.9 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 98.7 ± 0.2 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 1.86 ± 0.06 | 2.51 ± 0.06 | 2.5 |
| 3.6 ± 0.0 | 88.1 ± 0.4 | 0.94 ± 0.01 | 2.41 ± 0.02 | 2.75 ± 0.01 | 3.8 |
| 4.4 ± 0.0 | 53.3 ± 0.3 | 1.25 ± 0.02 | 2.57 ± 0.01 | 2.79 ± 0.01 | 4.8 |
| 4.9 ± 0.0 | 29.7 ± 0.2 | 1.37 ± 0.01 | 2.59 ± 0.00 | 2.78 ± 0.01 | 5.1 |
| 5.4 ± 0.0 | 13.1 ± 0.1 | 1.42 ± 0.01 | 2.58 ± 0.00 | 2.77 ± 0.01 | 5.3 |
num_tables = 2
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.47 ± 0.00 | 0.82 ± 0.01 | 1.11 ± 0.04 | 1.5 |
| 2.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 0.92 ± 0.01 | 1.31 ± 0.06 | 1.6 |
| 2.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 1.54 ± 0.04 | 1.9 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 99.5 ± 0.1 | 0.62 ± 0.00 | 1.47 ± 0.01 | 2.04 ± 0.03 | 2.6 |
| 6.7 ± 0.0 | 81.8 ± 0.2 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.01 | 2.53 ± 0.01 | 5.0 |
| 7.7 ± 0.0 | 46.6 ± 0.1 | 1.28 ± 0.01 | 2.33 ± 0.01 | 2.58 ± 0.01 | 5.8 |
| 8.3 ± 0.0 | 20.3 ± 0.1 | 1.32 ± 0.01 | 2.36 ± 0.01 | 2.60 ± 0.01 | 5.9 |
num_tables = 5
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.06 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 1.4 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.47 ± 0.00 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.02 | 1.5 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 0.79 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 1.7 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 2.0 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 99.3 ± 0.1 | 0.61 ± 0.00 | 1.35 ± 0.01 | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 3.1 |
| 14.0 ± 0.0 | 85.6 ± 0.2 | 0.95 ± 0.00 | 1.91 ± 0.00 | 2.28 ± 0.01 | 5.0 |
| 17.9 ± 0.0 | 43.6 ± 0.2 | 1.28 ± 0.00 | 2.21 ± 0.00 | 2.48 ± 0.01 | 6.2 |
num_tables = 10
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.59 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.00 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 1.4 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 1.5 |
| 2.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.47 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.01 | 1.6 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 1.9 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 99.9 ± 0.0 | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 0.98 ± 0.00 | 1.30 ± 0.02 | 2.7 |
| 15.7 ± 0.1 | 95.8 ± 0.0 | 0.69 ± 0.00 | 1.37 ± 0.01 | 1.72 ± 0.02 | 4.1 |
| 25.2 ± 0.1 | 61.4 ± 0.2 | 0.94 ± 0.00 | 1.70 ± 0.00 | 2.03 ± 0.01 | 5.6 |
num_tables = 20
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.56 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 1.4 |
| 2.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 1.5 |
| 2.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.47 ± 0.00 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 1.6 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 1.8 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.52 ± 0.00 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 1.06 ± 0.02 | 2.5 |
| 16.0 ± 0.1 | 97.4 ± 0.1 | 0.59 ± 0.00 | 1.08 ± 0.01 | 1.36 ± 0.01 | 3.7 |
| 27.0 ± 0.0 | 65.9 ± 0.1 | 0.75 ± 0.00 | 1.31 ± 0.00 | 1.57 ± 0.01 | 5.3 |
num_tables = 50
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.00 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.60 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 1.3 |
| 2.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.61 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 1.4 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.47 ± 0.00 | 0.62 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 1.6 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 0.65 ± 0.00 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 1.8 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.51 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.00 | 0.92 ± 0.01 | 2.4 |
| 16.1 ± 0.1 | 97.9 ± 0.1 | 0.56 ± 0.00 | 0.92 ± 0.00 | 1.13 ± 0.01 | 3.5 |
| 27.7 ± 0.1 | 67.5 ± 0.1 | 0.67 ± 0.00 | 1.08 ± 0.00 | 1.28 ± 0.00 | 5.2 |
Notes
- Latencies reported in seconds (converted from milliseconds)
- Values shown as mean ± standard deviation across multiple seeds
- Throughput = commits per second during steady-state window
- Success rate = percentage of transactions that committed successfully
- Mean retries = average number of retry attempts per committed transaction