Commit Latency vs Throughput
Commit Latency vs Throughput
Analysis of how commit latency scales with achieved throughput.
Values shown as mean ± standard deviation across seeds.
num_tables = 1
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 1.01 ± 0.04 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 1.43 ± 0.07 | 1.6 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 99.9 ± 0.0 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 1.22 ± 0.03 | 1.80 ± 0.05 | 1.8 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 99.1 ± 0.1 | 0.60 ± 0.00 | 1.62 ± 0.04 | 2.25 ± 0.04 | 2.4 |
| 3.8 ± 0.0 | 91.3 ± 0.4 | 0.85 ± 0.01 | 2.19 ± 0.02 | 2.54 ± 0.01 | 3.6 |
| 4.6 ± 0.0 | 56.5 ± 0.2 | 1.16 ± 0.01 | 2.39 ± 0.01 | 2.60 ± 0.02 | 4.8 |
| 5.1 ± 0.0 | 31.3 ± 0.1 | 1.28 ± 0.01 | 2.40 ± 0.01 | 2.60 ± 0.01 | 5.2 |
| 5.7 ± 0.0 | 13.8 ± 0.1 | 1.33 ± 0.01 | 2.39 ± 0.00 | 2.58 ± 0.01 | 5.4 |
num_tables = 2
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 1.02 ± 0.05 | 1.4 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 1.14 ± 0.04 | 1.6 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 1.33 ± 0.04 | 1.8 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 99.8 ± 0.1 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 1.27 ± 0.02 | 1.78 ± 0.06 | 2.4 |
| 7.2 ± 0.0 | 87.1 ± 0.1 | 0.91 ± 0.00 | 2.03 ± 0.00 | 2.35 ± 0.01 | 4.7 |
| 8.4 ± 0.0 | 51.6 ± 0.1 | 1.15 ± 0.01 | 2.15 ± 0.00 | 2.40 ± 0.00 | 5.7 |
| 9.3 ± 0.0 | 22.7 ± 0.1 | 1.21 ± 0.01 | 2.19 ± 0.01 | 2.41 ± 0.01 | 5.9 |
num_tables = 5
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.41 ± 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.03 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.41 ± 0.00 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.72 ± 0.01 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 1.4 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 1.5 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.93 ± 0.01 | 1.6 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 1.06 ± 0.02 | 1.9 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 99.8 ± 0.1 | 0.52 ± 0.00 | 1.14 ± 0.01 | 1.57 ± 0.03 | 2.8 |
| 15.1 ± 0.0 | 91.4 ± 0.1 | 0.80 ± 0.00 | 1.75 ± 0.01 | 2.14 ± 0.01 | 4.6 |
| 20.2 ± 0.1 | 49.2 ± 0.0 | 1.14 ± 0.01 | 2.06 ± 0.00 | 2.32 ± 0.00 | 6.1 |
num_tables = 10
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.39 ± 0.00 | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.41 ± 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 1.3 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 1.4 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 1.6 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.69 ± 0.00 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 1.8 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.47 ± 0.00 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 1.09 ± 0.02 | 2.4 |
| 16.3 ± 0.0 | 99.1 ± 0.0 | 0.56 ± 0.00 | 1.18 ± 0.00 | 1.56 ± 0.01 | 3.5 |
| 30.9 ± 0.1 | 75.3 ± 0.1 | 0.86 ± 0.00 | 1.69 ± 0.01 | 2.05 ± 0.01 | 5.5 |
num_tables = 20
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.01 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.41 ± 0.00 | 0.55 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
| 1.7 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.01 | 1.3 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 1.4 |
| 2.7 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 1.5 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.63 ± 0.00 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 1.8 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.72 ± 0.00 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 2.3 |
| 16.3 ± 0.0 | 99.7 ± 0.0 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | 0.88 ± 0.00 | 1.15 ± 0.01 | 3.1 |
| 34.7 ± 0.1 | 84.5 ± 0.2 | 0.64 ± 0.00 | 1.21 ± 0.00 | 1.52 ± 0.00 | 5.0 |
num_tables = 50
| Throughput (c/s) | Success Rate (%) | P50 Latency (s) | P95 Latency (s) | P99 Latency (s) | Mean Retries |
|---|
| 0.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 1.0 |
| 0.4 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.38 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.01 | 1.1 |
| 0.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
| 1.6 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 1.3 |
| 2.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.00 | 0.56 ± 0.00 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 1.4 |
| 2.8 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | 1.5 |
| 4.1 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.59 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 1.7 |
| 8.2 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.00 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 2.2 |
| 16.4 ± 0.1 | 99.8 ± 0.0 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 0.75 ± 0.00 | 0.93 ± 0.01 | 2.9 |
| 35.7 ± 0.0 | 86.9 ± 0.1 | 0.55 ± 0.00 | 0.93 ± 0.00 | 1.14 ± 0.00 | 4.7 |
Notes
- Latencies reported in seconds (converted from milliseconds)
- Values shown as mean ± standard deviation across multiple seeds
- Throughput = commits per second during steady-state window
- Success rate = percentage of transactions that committed successfully
- Mean retries = average number of retry attempts per committed transaction
